Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Approved resolution plans extinguish unsubmitted pre-approval tax claims, preventing later recovery outside the insolvency process and preserving a cl...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
641 to 660 of 95752 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated against the first petitioner-company, and a moratorium was imposed, prohibiting any creation of charge on its properties during the CIRP period. Despite this, the respondents created a charge on the petitioner's properties, violating the IBC's provisions. Subsequently, an acquisition plan for the petitioner-company was approved by the NCLT, extinguishing all existing debts, including tax dues owed to the respondents. The IBC's "Clean Slate" principle mandates the extinguishment of all government dues upon approval of a resolution/acquisition plan. The respondents' claim of priority for tax dues as "Crown Debt" was rejected. The High Court issued a mandamus, directing the removal of the respondents' charge/red entries on the petitioner's properties, as their actions were illegal and arbitrary under the IBC.
Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated against the first petitioner-company, and a moratorium was imposed, prohibiting any creation of charge on its properties during the CIRP period. Despite this, the respondents created a charge on the petitioner's properties, violating the IBC's provisions. Subsequently, an acquisition plan for the petitioner-company was approved by the NCLT, extinguishing all existing debts, including tax dues owed to the respondents. The IBC's "Clean Slate" principle mandates the extinguishment of all government dues upon approval of a resolution/acquisition plan. The respondents' claim of priority for tax dues as "Crown Debt" was rejected. The High Court issued a mandamus, directing the removal of the respondents' charge/red entries on the petitioner's properties, as their actions were illegal and arbitrary under the IBC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
