Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Challenge to adjudication order u/s 73(9) of CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 - petitioners claimed no opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice and CBIC circular. Court held petitioners' response was considered by proper officer as noted in order. Sufficiency of response cannot be subject matter of writ petition under Article 226. Though petitioners claimed violation of statutory provisions by not affording hearing, it was an afterthought as they did not file appeal within limitation period or approach Court expeditiously. Court granted leave to prefer appeal on payment of costs, subject to filing within two weeks. Petition disposed of.
Challenge to adjudication order u/s 73(9) of CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 - petitioners claimed no opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice and CBIC circular. Court held petitioners' response was considered by proper officer as noted in order. Sufficiency of response cannot be subject matter of writ petition under Article 226. Though petitioners claimed violation of statutory provisions by not affording hearing, it was an afterthought as they did not file appeal within limitation period or approach Court expeditiously. Court granted leave to prefer appeal on payment of costs, subject to filing within two weeks. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
