Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Challenge to adjudication order u/s 73(9) of CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 - petitioners claimed no opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice and CBIC circular. Court held petitioners' response was considered by proper officer as noted in order. Sufficiency of response cannot be subject matter of writ petition under Article 226. Though petitioners claimed violation of statutory provisions by not affording hearing, it was an afterthought as they did not file appeal within limitation period or approach Court expeditiously. Court granted leave to prefer appeal on payment of costs, subject to filing within two weeks. Petition disposed of.
Challenge to adjudication order u/s 73(9) of CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 - petitioners claimed no opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice and CBIC circular. Court held petitioners' response was considered by proper officer as noted in order. Sufficiency of response cannot be subject matter of writ petition under Article 226. Though petitioners claimed violation of statutory provisions by not affording hearing, it was an afterthought as they did not file appeal within limitation period or approach Court expeditiously. Court granted leave to prefer appeal on payment of costs, subject to filing within two weeks. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
