Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The applicant sought regular bail, accused of availing wrongful input tax credit benefits worth Rs.15.58 crores through fictitious transactions with 38 firms. Considering the nature of allegations in the FIR, punishment of 5 years, arrest in June 2024, and attachment of applicant's firm assets, the High Court allowed bail upon executing a bond of Rs.10,000 with one surety of like amount and subject to conditions by the trial court u/s 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.
The applicant sought regular bail, accused of availing wrongful input tax credit benefits worth Rs.15.58 crores through fictitious transactions with 38 firms. Considering the nature of allegations in the FIR, punishment of 5 years, arrest in June 2024, and attachment of applicant's firm assets, the High Court allowed bail upon executing a bond of Rs.10,000 with one surety of like amount and subject to conditions by the trial court u/s 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.