Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The consent decree u/s 50C granted absolute ownership rights to Smt. Manju Agarwal over the 1314 sq.ft. office premises, allowing her to use, enjoy, and deal with it without objection. The property was sold by Nav Technology Pvt. Ltd., represented by Ms. Anmol Agarwal, without authority from other directors. The executing court cannot direct a person other than the vendor to bear tax liability arising from the transaction, as it would violate Income Tax Act provisions. While the judgment-debtors disregarded the decree's intention, the court cannot ask Smt. Manju Agarwal to shoulder tax responsibility at this stage. Further evidence is required regarding surrender or surrender value of the VIP Road property. As some decree obligations have been complied with, the other prayers cannot be allowed without specific details.
The consent decree u/s 50C granted absolute ownership rights to Smt. Manju Agarwal over the 1314 sq.ft. office premises, allowing her to use, enjoy, and deal with it without objection. The property was sold by Nav Technology Pvt. Ltd., represented by Ms. Anmol Agarwal, without authority from other directors. The executing court cannot direct a person other than the vendor to bear tax liability arising from the transaction, as it would violate Income Tax Act provisions. While the judgment-debtors disregarded the decree's intention, the court cannot ask Smt. Manju Agarwal to shoulder tax responsibility at this stage. Further evidence is required regarding surrender or surrender value of the VIP Road property. As some decree obligations have been complied with, the other prayers cannot be allowed without specific details.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
