Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case pertains to the reopening of assessment u/s 147 regarding capital gains on the sale of land. The key issue was the apportionment of income between spouses governed by the Portuguese Civil Code applicable in Goa. The court held that Section 5A of the Income Tax Act, which deals with the division of income between spouses governed by the Portuguese Civil Code, was not applicable as the petitioner's husband had passed away in 1986. The court ruled that the petitioner's substantive rights were governed by the Portuguese Civil Code, and the mere non-mention of this in the return of income would not allow taxation of the sale proceeds beyond the petitioner's share. The court criticized the Revenue's reasoning for rejecting the explanation, stating that the Sale Deed was available and should have been considered. Ultimately, the reopening notice was quashed, and the decision favored the assessee.
The case pertains to the reopening of assessment u/s 147 regarding capital gains on the sale of land. The key issue was the apportionment of income between spouses governed by the Portuguese Civil Code applicable in Goa. The court held that Section 5A of the Income Tax Act, which deals with the division of income between spouses governed by the Portuguese Civil Code, was not applicable as the petitioner's husband had passed away in 1986. The court ruled that the petitioner's substantive rights were governed by the Portuguese Civil Code, and the mere non-mention of this in the return of income would not allow taxation of the sale proceeds beyond the petitioner's share. The court criticized the Revenue's reasoning for rejecting the explanation, stating that the Sale Deed was available and should have been considered. Ultimately, the reopening notice was quashed, and the decision favored the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.