Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case deals with the taxability of receipts from Indian customers for providing access to online databases/journals or sale of hard copy journals. The key points are: the assessee did not have a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India. Providing access to online databases/journals does not amount to royalty as it merely grants access to copyrighted articles, not the copyright itself, as per Supreme Court decisions. The receipts do not constitute consideration for granting rights in the copyright under Explanation 2 to Section 9(1)(vi) of the Act, hence not taxable as royalty. The services also do not qualify as Fees for Included Services (FIS) as they do not satisfy the 'make available' clause under Article 12 of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). Consequently, the receipts from Indian customers for offshore sales of books/journals or providing access to online journals/online library are not taxable as royalties or FIS under the Act or the Treaty. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
The case deals with the taxability of receipts from Indian customers for providing access to online databases/journals or sale of hard copy journals. The key points are: the assessee did not have a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India. Providing access to online databases/journals does not amount to royalty as it merely grants access to copyrighted articles, not the copyright itself, as per Supreme Court decisions. The receipts do not constitute consideration for granting rights in the copyright under Explanation 2 to Section 9(1)(vi) of the Act, hence not taxable as royalty. The services also do not qualify as Fees for Included Services (FIS) as they do not satisfy the 'make available' clause under Article 12 of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). Consequently, the receipts from Indian customers for offshore sales of books/journals or providing access to online journals/online library are not taxable as royalties or FIS under the Act or the Treaty. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.