Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
This case revolves around the addition of cash deposits u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act, where the assessees failed to provide credible explanations regarding the source. The Jharkhand High Court upheld the ruling, dismissing the appeals filed by the assessees, as they could not prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the creditors. Regarding interest charges u/ss 234A and 234B, the court ruled that interest u/s 234A could only be charged on returned income, not assessed income. However, the Tribunal's finding on Section 234B was contrary to the amended provisions, favoring the revenue department's stance.
This case revolves around the addition of cash deposits u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act, where the assessees failed to provide credible explanations regarding the source. The Jharkhand High Court upheld the ruling, dismissing the appeals filed by the assessees, as they could not prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the creditors. Regarding interest charges u/ss 234A and 234B, the court ruled that interest u/s 234A could only be charged on returned income, not assessed income. However, the Tribunal's finding on Section 234B was contrary to the amended provisions, favoring the revenue department's stance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
