Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The assessee failed to deduct tax on professional fees paid to various non-residents. The Assessing Officer (AO) held that the fees were liable to tax in India under the Act and applicable tax treaties. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] deleted substantial disallowance u/s 40(a)(i), holding that the fees were business profits or income from independent personal services not taxable in India due to lack of permanent establishment or fixed base. The Tribunal concurred with CIT(A) that fees paid to UK residents were not taxable in India. Regarding fees to KPMG International Cooperative, Switzerland, following its earlier order, the Tribunal held that contributions were covered by the mutuality concept and not taxable income, upholding CIT(A)'s deletion of disallowance. The Tribunal also upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of 25% ad-hoc disallowance of advertisement expenses, citing lack of basis and judicial precedent. For professional fees to an Australian firm, the Tribunal held that under the tax treaty, such income was not taxable in India due to lack of fixed base, agreeing with CIT(A)'s deletion of disallowance u/s 40(a)(i). The Tribunal also confirmed CIT(A)'s consequential deletion of disallowance of foreign exchange fluctuation loss related to professional fees.
The assessee failed to deduct tax on professional fees paid to various non-residents. The Assessing Officer (AO) held that the fees were liable to tax in India under the Act and applicable tax treaties. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] deleted substantial disallowance u/s 40(a)(i), holding that the fees were business profits or income from independent personal services not taxable in India due to lack of permanent establishment or fixed base. The Tribunal concurred with CIT(A) that fees paid to UK residents were not taxable in India. Regarding fees to KPMG International Cooperative, Switzerland, following its earlier order, the Tribunal held that contributions were covered by the mutuality concept and not taxable income, upholding CIT(A)'s deletion of disallowance. The Tribunal also upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of 25% ad-hoc disallowance of advertisement expenses, citing lack of basis and judicial precedent. For professional fees to an Australian firm, the Tribunal held that under the tax treaty, such income was not taxable in India due to lack of fixed base, agreeing with CIT(A)'s deletion of disallowance u/s 40(a)(i). The Tribunal also confirmed CIT(A)'s consequential deletion of disallowance of foreign exchange fluctuation loss related to professional fees.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.