Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Principles of natural justice violated. Respondent disregarded petitioner's clarifications, GSTR 9 reconciliation, audited balance sheet, confirming show cause notice allegations through impugned order citing "incomplete documents" despite discrepancies in GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B filings. High Court held show cause notice issued 28.12.2023, petitioner filed reply 11.03.2024 with final reconciliation, E-Way bill turnover reconciliation with GSTR-1 and seven supporting documents, but respondent mechanically passed impugned order without considering reply. Impugned order set aside, matter remitted to respondent to consider reply, reconciliations, documents, provide personal hearing opportunity, and pass detailed speaking order. Petition disposed by way of remand.
Principles of natural justice violated. Respondent disregarded petitioner's clarifications, GSTR 9 reconciliation, audited balance sheet, confirming show cause notice allegations through impugned order citing "incomplete documents" despite discrepancies in GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B filings. High Court held show cause notice issued 28.12.2023, petitioner filed reply 11.03.2024 with final reconciliation, E-Way bill turnover reconciliation with GSTR-1 and seven supporting documents, but respondent mechanically passed impugned order without considering reply. Impugned order set aside, matter remitted to respondent to consider reply, reconciliations, documents, provide personal hearing opportunity, and pass detailed speaking order. Petition disposed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
