Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Taxability of hardship compensation received by an assessee from a builder for vacating an existing flat for redevelopment purposes. The assessee claimed that such receipt is a capital receipt and not taxable income. The ITAT, relying on the Bombay High Court's decision in Sarfaraz S. Furniturewalla's case, held that any hardship or rehabilitation allowance paid by a developer for the hardship suffered due to dispossession cannot be considered a revenue receipt and is not liable to be taxed. Accordingly, the hardship allowance received by the assessee from the developer is not taxable income, and the assessee's ground was allowed.
Taxability of hardship compensation received by an assessee from a builder for vacating an existing flat for redevelopment purposes. The assessee claimed that such receipt is a capital receipt and not taxable income. The ITAT, relying on the Bombay High Court's decision in Sarfaraz S. Furniturewalla's case, held that any hardship or rehabilitation allowance paid by a developer for the hardship suffered due to dispossession cannot be considered a revenue receipt and is not liable to be taxed. Accordingly, the hardship allowance received by the assessee from the developer is not taxable income, and the assessee's ground was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.