Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
The order passed by CIT(A) is invalid as it was passed ex-parte without affording adequate opportunity of being heard and denying inspection of assessment records, violating principles of natural justice. The order was passed on 18.03.2022, a public holiday, despite notice requiring assessee to submit written submissions by 21.03.2022. CIT(A) erroneously concluded documents sought were irrelevant or already in assessee's possession without evidence. Denying certified copies of assessment record deprived assessee of documentary evidence. Adjournments sought were due to partial supply of records despite repeated reminders. The order violates natural justice and is set aside. Matter remanded to CIT(A) to decide afresh expeditiously within three months, allowing assessee's appeal for statistical purposes.
The order passed by CIT(A) is invalid as it was passed ex-parte without affording adequate opportunity of being heard and denying inspection of assessment records, violating principles of natural justice. The order was passed on 18.03.2022, a public holiday, despite notice requiring assessee to submit written submissions by 21.03.2022. CIT(A) erroneously concluded documents sought were irrelevant or already in assessee's possession without evidence. Denying certified copies of assessment record deprived assessee of documentary evidence. Adjournments sought were due to partial supply of records despite repeated reminders. The order violates natural justice and is set aside. Matter remanded to CIT(A) to decide afresh expeditiously within three months, allowing assessee's appeal for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
