Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Petitioner sought to quash the show-cause notice (SCN) demanding Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) along with interest and penalty on salaries paid to expatriates. The issue pertained to whether the supply of manpower and recruitment services from overseas group entities to the petitioner attracted IGST. The High Court did not delve into the merits but relegated the matter to the stage of reply to the SCN. The authorities were directed to consider the applicability of Circular No. 210/4/2024-GST dated 26.06.2024 while adjudicating the reply. The petitioner was granted three weeks to file the reply from the receipt of the order's certified copy.
Petitioner sought to quash the show-cause notice (SCN) demanding Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) along with interest and penalty on salaries paid to expatriates. The issue pertained to whether the supply of manpower and recruitment services from overseas group entities to the petitioner attracted IGST. The High Court did not delve into the merits but relegated the matter to the stage of reply to the SCN. The authorities were directed to consider the applicability of Circular No. 210/4/2024-GST dated 26.06.2024 while adjudicating the reply. The petitioner was granted three weeks to file the reply from the receipt of the order's certified copy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
