Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2741 to 2760 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Petitioner sought to quash the show-cause notice (SCN) demanding Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) along with interest and penalty on salaries paid to expatriates. The issue pertained to whether the supply of manpower and recruitment services from overseas group entities to the petitioner attracted IGST. The High Court did not delve into the merits but relegated the matter to the stage of reply to the SCN. The authorities were directed to consider the applicability of Circular No. 210/4/2024-GST dated 26.06.2024 while adjudicating the reply. The petitioner was granted three weeks to file the reply from the receipt of the order's certified copy.
Petitioner sought to quash the show-cause notice (SCN) demanding Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) along with interest and penalty on salaries paid to expatriates. The issue pertained to whether the supply of manpower and recruitment services from overseas group entities to the petitioner attracted IGST. The High Court did not delve into the merits but relegated the matter to the stage of reply to the SCN. The authorities were directed to consider the applicability of Circular No. 210/4/2024-GST dated 26.06.2024 while adjudicating the reply. The petitioner was granted three weeks to file the reply from the receipt of the order's certified copy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
