Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
The respondents were permitted to proceed against the petitioner under the provisions of the Act, including invoking powers u/s 74, following the court's modification order granting liberty to consider the matter beyond Section 73. The challenge to the notice issued u/s 74 alleging fraud or suppression of facts cannot be assailed. The determination of whether suppression of facts warranting invocation of Section 74 occurred is a factual issue, and the authority has jurisdiction to issue a notice under that section. The writ court should not intervene at this stage when the petitioner is merely asked to show cause against the proposed action. The petition is disposed of.
The respondents were permitted to proceed against the petitioner under the provisions of the Act, including invoking powers u/s 74, following the court's modification order granting liberty to consider the matter beyond Section 73. The challenge to the notice issued u/s 74 alleging fraud or suppression of facts cannot be assailed. The determination of whether suppression of facts warranting invocation of Section 74 occurred is a factual issue, and the authority has jurisdiction to issue a notice under that section. The writ court should not intervene at this stage when the petitioner is merely asked to show cause against the proposed action. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
