Fraud-based GST assessment cannot stand without allegations of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression; proceedings must follow normal classificatio...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1121 to 1140 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The assessee, a licensed commission agent in the Agricultural Market Committee Yard, Guntur, claimed credit for the entire amount deducted as tax at source u/s 194Q from commission income, which was deducted as tax at source u/s 194A from interest income. The assessee relied on CBDT Circular No. 452 and the case of Yagneswari General Traders, stating that the turnover of Kaccha Arahtias includes only the gross commission and not the sales effected on behalf of principals. The ITAT held that since the assessee acted as an agent (Kaccha Arahtia), the CBDT Circular applied, and the assessee was eligible to get credit for the entire amount deducted as tax at source. Consequently, there was no shortfall of TDS as concluded by the Revenue Authorities, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
The assessee, a licensed commission agent in the Agricultural Market Committee Yard, Guntur, claimed credit for the entire amount deducted as tax at source u/s 194Q from commission income, which was deducted as tax at source u/s 194A from interest income. The assessee relied on CBDT Circular No. 452 and the case of Yagneswari General Traders, stating that the turnover of Kaccha Arahtias includes only the gross commission and not the sales effected on behalf of principals. The ITAT held that since the assessee acted as an agent (Kaccha Arahtia), the CBDT Circular applied, and the assessee was eligible to get credit for the entire amount deducted as tax at source. Consequently, there was no shortfall of TDS as concluded by the Revenue Authorities, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.