Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The High Court quashed the assessment order passed u/s 147 read with Sections 144 and 144B, as well as the consequential notices u/ss 156 and 274 read with 271AA(1) of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the petitioner had complied with the requirements of the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 (IDS) by making a declaration and depositing the appropriate tax amount. Consequently, the petitioner was entitled to the benefits under the IDS. The court directed the respondents to issue an appropriate certificate of tax deposit under the IDS to the petitioner within four weeks.
The High Court quashed the assessment order passed u/s 147 read with Sections 144 and 144B, as well as the consequential notices u/ss 156 and 274 read with 271AA(1) of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the petitioner had complied with the requirements of the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 (IDS) by making a declaration and depositing the appropriate tax amount. Consequently, the petitioner was entitled to the benefits under the IDS. The court directed the respondents to issue an appropriate certificate of tax deposit under the IDS to the petitioner within four weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
