Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The High Court quashed the assessment order passed u/s 147 read with Sections 144 and 144B, as well as the consequential notices u/ss 156 and 274 read with 271AA(1) of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the petitioner had complied with the requirements of the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 (IDS) by making a declaration and depositing the appropriate tax amount. Consequently, the petitioner was entitled to the benefits under the IDS. The court directed the respondents to issue an appropriate certificate of tax deposit under the IDS to the petitioner within four weeks.
The High Court quashed the assessment order passed u/s 147 read with Sections 144 and 144B, as well as the consequential notices u/ss 156 and 274 read with 271AA(1) of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the petitioner had complied with the requirements of the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 (IDS) by making a declaration and depositing the appropriate tax amount. Consequently, the petitioner was entitled to the benefits under the IDS. The court directed the respondents to issue an appropriate certificate of tax deposit under the IDS to the petitioner within four weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
