Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Software license expenses incurred by the assessee were held to be revenue expenditure based on the coordinate bench's decision in DCIT v/s M/s First Advantage Private Limited for the preceding year. Regarding disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia), the assessee admitted deducting TDS at a lower rate on Rs. 98,363 and offered 30% of this amount for disallowance. The CIT(A) rightly deleted the disallowance made by the AO, as the assessee had already disallowed 30% of the relevant payments. The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s order on this issue.
Software license expenses incurred by the assessee were held to be revenue expenditure based on the coordinate bench's decision in DCIT v/s M/s First Advantage Private Limited for the preceding year. Regarding disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia), the assessee admitted deducting TDS at a lower rate on Rs. 98,363 and offered 30% of this amount for disallowance. The CIT(A) rightly deleted the disallowance made by the AO, as the assessee had already disallowed 30% of the relevant payments. The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s order on this issue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.