Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Challenge to an order issued under Form GST DRC-07 for the difference in tax amount between GSTR 3B and GSTR 1. The impugned orders were passed without considering the petitioner's reply, violating the principles of natural justice. The court held that the respondent failed to consider the petitioner's reply, which stated a clerical error in GSTR 3B and correct filing of GSTR 1, supported by necessary bills. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration on the condition that the petitioner pays 15% of the disputed tax within four weeks. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
Challenge to an order issued under Form GST DRC-07 for the difference in tax amount between GSTR 3B and GSTR 1. The impugned orders were passed without considering the petitioner's reply, violating the principles of natural justice. The court held that the respondent failed to consider the petitioner's reply, which stated a clerical error in GSTR 3B and correct filing of GSTR 1, supported by necessary bills. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration on the condition that the petitioner pays 15% of the disputed tax within four weeks. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
