Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Challenge to an order issued under Form GST DRC-07 for the difference in tax amount between GSTR 3B and GSTR 1. The impugned orders were passed without considering the petitioner's reply, violating the principles of natural justice. The court held that the respondent failed to consider the petitioner's reply, which stated a clerical error in GSTR 3B and correct filing of GSTR 1, supported by necessary bills. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration on the condition that the petitioner pays 15% of the disputed tax within four weeks. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
Challenge to an order issued under Form GST DRC-07 for the difference in tax amount between GSTR 3B and GSTR 1. The impugned orders were passed without considering the petitioner's reply, violating the principles of natural justice. The court held that the respondent failed to consider the petitioner's reply, which stated a clerical error in GSTR 3B and correct filing of GSTR 1, supported by necessary bills. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration on the condition that the petitioner pays 15% of the disputed tax within four weeks. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
