Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court quashed the reassessment notices issued u/s 148 and the consequent initiation of reassessment proceedings, ruling in favor of the assessee. The key points are: 1) Failure to electronically upload Form 10CCB cannot lead to the conclusion that the assessee failed to make a full and true disclosure, as required for reopening assessment u/s 147. 2) For the assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15, the reassessment action was initiated beyond the maximum permissible period of six years u/s 149, rendering it invalid. 3) Section 80-IA(7) prior to its amendment in 2020 only required furnishing the audit report along with the return, and failure to electronically file it u/r 12 cannot be considered fatal to the claim u/s 80-IA. 4) The requirement of furnishing the audit report before the specified date u/s 44AB was introduced only in 2020, and the court left open the question of its impact post-2020. 5) Section 10B(8) has more imperative language than Section 80-IA(7) regarding furnishing declarations before the due date u/s 139(1).
The High Court quashed the reassessment notices issued u/s 148 and the consequent initiation of reassessment proceedings, ruling in favor of the assessee. The key points are: 1) Failure to electronically upload Form 10CCB cannot lead to the conclusion that the assessee failed to make a full and true disclosure, as required for reopening assessment u/s 147. 2) For the assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15, the reassessment action was initiated beyond the maximum permissible period of six years u/s 149, rendering it invalid. 3) Section 80-IA(7) prior to its amendment in 2020 only required furnishing the audit report along with the return, and failure to electronically file it u/r 12 cannot be considered fatal to the claim u/s 80-IA. 4) The requirement of furnishing the audit report before the specified date u/s 44AB was introduced only in 2020, and the court left open the question of its impact post-2020. 5) Section 10B(8) has more imperative language than Section 80-IA(7) regarding furnishing declarations before the due date u/s 139(1).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.