Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The High Court quashed the reassessment notices issued u/s 148 and the consequent initiation of reassessment proceedings, ruling in favor of the assessee. The key points are: 1) Failure to electronically upload Form 10CCB cannot lead to the conclusion that the assessee failed to make a full and true disclosure, as required for reopening assessment u/s 147. 2) For the assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15, the reassessment action was initiated beyond the maximum permissible period of six years u/s 149, rendering it invalid. 3) Section 80-IA(7) prior to its amendment in 2020 only required furnishing the audit report along with the return, and failure to electronically file it u/r 12 cannot be considered fatal to the claim u/s 80-IA. 4) The requirement of furnishing the audit report before the specified date u/s 44AB was introduced only in 2020, and the court left open the question of its impact post-2020. 5) Section 10B(8) has more imperative language than Section 80-IA(7) regarding furnishing declarations before the due date u/s 139(1).
The High Court quashed the reassessment notices issued u/s 148 and the consequent initiation of reassessment proceedings, ruling in favor of the assessee. The key points are: 1) Failure to electronically upload Form 10CCB cannot lead to the conclusion that the assessee failed to make a full and true disclosure, as required for reopening assessment u/s 147. 2) For the assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15, the reassessment action was initiated beyond the maximum permissible period of six years u/s 149, rendering it invalid. 3) Section 80-IA(7) prior to its amendment in 2020 only required furnishing the audit report along with the return, and failure to electronically file it u/r 12 cannot be considered fatal to the claim u/s 80-IA. 4) The requirement of furnishing the audit report before the specified date u/s 44AB was introduced only in 2020, and the court left open the question of its impact post-2020. 5) Section 10B(8) has more imperative language than Section 80-IA(7) regarding furnishing declarations before the due date u/s 139(1).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.