Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The impugned order was passed ex parte without providing notice to the petitioner for the subsequent hearing date, violating principles of natural justice. Relying on a coordinate bench judgment in M/s Shubham Steel Traders Vs. State of U.P. and Another, where it was held that by not passing the order on the scheduled date and not communicating the next date, the assessing authority forced an ex-parte order, the court quashed the impugned order dated March 1, 2024, and directed the authority to grant an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of.
The impugned order was passed ex parte without providing notice to the petitioner for the subsequent hearing date, violating principles of natural justice. Relying on a coordinate bench judgment in M/s Shubham Steel Traders Vs. State of U.P. and Another, where it was held that by not passing the order on the scheduled date and not communicating the next date, the assessing authority forced an ex-parte order, the court quashed the impugned order dated March 1, 2024, and directed the authority to grant an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
