Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Cancellation of a petitioner's Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration. The Show Cause Notice (SCN) did not provide specific details of the allegations, violating principles of natural justice. The petitioner had applied for revocation of the cancellation order, stating that business activities were halted due to COVID-19 but would resume gradually. The petitioner provided property tax receipts and explained ownership of the principal place of business. The cancellation order was passed by the Proper Officer based on directions from another authority, which was impermissible. The Proper Officer was required to independently assess the reasons for cancellation. The High Court set aside the SCN, cancellation order, and appellate order, directing the respondents to restore the petitioner's GST registration forthwith.
Cancellation of a petitioner's Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration. The Show Cause Notice (SCN) did not provide specific details of the allegations, violating principles of natural justice. The petitioner had applied for revocation of the cancellation order, stating that business activities were halted due to COVID-19 but would resume gradually. The petitioner provided property tax receipts and explained ownership of the principal place of business. The cancellation order was passed by the Proper Officer based on directions from another authority, which was impermissible. The Proper Officer was required to independently assess the reasons for cancellation. The High Court set aside the SCN, cancellation order, and appellate order, directing the respondents to restore the petitioner's GST registration forthwith.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
