TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
The assessee, a Nagar Palika Parishad, failed to collect tax at source (TCS) on payments received for granting a license for a parking lot. However, the assessee contended that the money collected was on behalf of the government and expended for the welfare of citizens. As a non-profit organization, the assessee faced constraints in understanding tax laws and did not receive advice on TCS collection. Upon being informed of the default, the assessee swiftly complied. Considering these circumstances, the Appellate Tribunal held that the assessee cannot be treated as an assessee in default per se, and there existed reasonable cause for the technical default. Consequently, the penalties imposed u/ss 271CA and 271C were deleted, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
The assessee, a Nagar Palika Parishad, failed to collect tax at source (TCS) on payments received for granting a license for a parking lot. However, the assessee contended that the money collected was on behalf of the government and expended for the welfare of citizens. As a non-profit organization, the assessee faced constraints in understanding tax laws and did not receive advice on TCS collection. Upon being informed of the default, the assessee swiftly complied. Considering these circumstances, the Appellate Tribunal held that the assessee cannot be treated as an assessee in default per se, and there existed reasonable cause for the technical default. Consequently, the penalties imposed u/ss 271CA and 271C were deleted, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
