Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The assessee, a company engaged in development/construction and sale of flats and plots, had classified its properties into four categories: flats open for sale, let-out flats, self-occupied flats, and flats under litigation. The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of let-out properties from Annual Lettable Value (ALV) calculation, following its earlier orders. For properties under litigation, the issue was restored to the Assessing Officer to examine evidence for non-inclusion of ALV. For self-occupied properties, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to exclude ALV, as per Section 22 of the Act. Regarding windmill income, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow deduction for expenses incurred during the first three months, corresponding to the income taxed for that period. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s findings on slump sale and revenue clause. On basement ALV, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s estimation of 50% ALV due to restricted usage. The issue of disallowance of employees' PF/ESI contribution was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal allowed the revenue's ground on addition u/s 43CA, as the assessee did not contest it.
The assessee, a company engaged in development/construction and sale of flats and plots, had classified its properties into four categories: flats open for sale, let-out flats, self-occupied flats, and flats under litigation. The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of let-out properties from Annual Lettable Value (ALV) calculation, following its earlier orders. For properties under litigation, the issue was restored to the Assessing Officer to examine evidence for non-inclusion of ALV. For self-occupied properties, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to exclude ALV, as per Section 22 of the Act. Regarding windmill income, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow deduction for expenses incurred during the first three months, corresponding to the income taxed for that period. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s findings on slump sale and revenue clause. On basement ALV, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s estimation of 50% ALV due to restricted usage. The issue of disallowance of employees' PF/ESI contribution was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal allowed the revenue's ground on addition u/s 43CA, as the assessee did not contest it.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.