Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The High Court held that the question of whether the recovery of short-levied duty along with interest is barred by the limitation period prescribed under sub-section (9) of Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 is a mixed question of law and fact, which cannot be adjudicated in the writ petition. The appellant was directed to prefer a statutory appeal and raise the limitation plea before the appellate authority. The appellate authority was instructed to consider the appeal on merits, untrammeled by the findings in the impugned judgment. The time during which the appellant prosecuted the writ petition was ordered to be excluded while computing the period of limitation. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
The High Court held that the question of whether the recovery of short-levied duty along with interest is barred by the limitation period prescribed under sub-section (9) of Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 is a mixed question of law and fact, which cannot be adjudicated in the writ petition. The appellant was directed to prefer a statutory appeal and raise the limitation plea before the appellate authority. The appellate authority was instructed to consider the appeal on merits, untrammeled by the findings in the impugned judgment. The time during which the appellant prosecuted the writ petition was ordered to be excluded while computing the period of limitation. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
