Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Petition challenged impugned order passed by respondent for assessment year 2018-19, contending violation of principles of natural justice due to non-issuance of notices. Court held petitioner may have merits as dispute pertained to difference in turnover reported in GSTR-7 and GSTR-3B. Partial relief granted by setting aside impugned order and remitting case to respondent for fresh order on merits. Impugned order quashed, treated as addendum to show cause notices. Petitioner directed to file consolidated reply within 30 days and deposit 20% of disputed tax from electronic cash register. Petition disposed off by way of remand.
Petition challenged impugned order passed by respondent for assessment year 2018-19, contending violation of principles of natural justice due to non-issuance of notices. Court held petitioner may have merits as dispute pertained to difference in turnover reported in GSTR-7 and GSTR-3B. Partial relief granted by setting aside impugned order and remitting case to respondent for fresh order on merits. Impugned order quashed, treated as addendum to show cause notices. Petitioner directed to file consolidated reply within 30 days and deposit 20% of disputed tax from electronic cash register. Petition disposed off by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
