Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Petition challenged impugned order passed by respondent for assessment year 2018-19, contending violation of principles of natural justice due to non-issuance of notices. Court held petitioner may have merits as dispute pertained to difference in turnover reported in GSTR-7 and GSTR-3B. Partial relief granted by setting aside impugned order and remitting case to respondent for fresh order on merits. Impugned order quashed, treated as addendum to show cause notices. Petitioner directed to file consolidated reply within 30 days and deposit 20% of disputed tax from electronic cash register. Petition disposed off by way of remand.
Petition challenged impugned order passed by respondent for assessment year 2018-19, contending violation of principles of natural justice due to non-issuance of notices. Court held petitioner may have merits as dispute pertained to difference in turnover reported in GSTR-7 and GSTR-3B. Partial relief granted by setting aside impugned order and remitting case to respondent for fresh order on merits. Impugned order quashed, treated as addendum to show cause notices. Petitioner directed to file consolidated reply within 30 days and deposit 20% of disputed tax from electronic cash register. Petition disposed off by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
