Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the rectification order u/s 154 was invalid due to violation of principles of natural justice, contravention of Section 154(3) provisions, and being barred by limitation. Crucial findings: No evidence of serving notice u/s 154 dated 01.12.2015 to the assessee, violating natural justice by not providing opportunity of being heard. Unexplained inordinate delay of 3 months in serving the rectification order dated 19.03.2018, despite promptly serving the original order u/s 143(3). Absence of evidence establishing the actual passing of order on 19.03.2018, with the ITD database indicating the date as 01.06.2018, rendering it time-barred. Consequently, the Assessing Officer's rectification order u/s 154 was cancelled, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the rectification order u/s 154 was invalid due to violation of principles of natural justice, contravention of Section 154(3) provisions, and being barred by limitation. Crucial findings: No evidence of serving notice u/s 154 dated 01.12.2015 to the assessee, violating natural justice by not providing opportunity of being heard. Unexplained inordinate delay of 3 months in serving the rectification order dated 19.03.2018, despite promptly serving the original order u/s 143(3). Absence of evidence establishing the actual passing of order on 19.03.2018, with the ITD database indicating the date as 01.06.2018, rendering it time-barred. Consequently, the Assessing Officer's rectification order u/s 154 was cancelled, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.