Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the consultancy services rendered by the assessee, such as organizational strategy, talent acquisition, rewards and benefits, and related leadership and development consulting, did not constitute Fees for Included Services (FIS) under Article 12 of the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The ITAT emphasized that for services to qualify as FIS, the recipient must acquire the ability to apply the technical knowledge, experience, or skill independently without recourse to the service provider in the future. The "make available" clause requires the transfer of technical knowledge, enabling the recipient to reproduce and utilize it on their own. Merely rendering consulting services that require expertise does not satisfy the "make available" requirement. The ITAT also allowed the appeal regarding reimbursements received from subsidiaries for general management charges, as no technical knowledge was made available, and the assessee merely passed on the costs incurred from third parties.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the consultancy services rendered by the assessee, such as organizational strategy, talent acquisition, rewards and benefits, and related leadership and development consulting, did not constitute Fees for Included Services (FIS) under Article 12 of the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The ITAT emphasized that for services to qualify as FIS, the recipient must acquire the ability to apply the technical knowledge, experience, or skill independently without recourse to the service provider in the future. The "make available" clause requires the transfer of technical knowledge, enabling the recipient to reproduce and utilize it on their own. Merely rendering consulting services that require expertise does not satisfy the "make available" requirement. The ITAT also allowed the appeal regarding reimbursements received from subsidiaries for general management charges, as no technical knowledge was made available, and the assessee merely passed on the costs incurred from third parties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.