Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The petitioners had resigned as directors on 23.02.1998, prior to the alleged cause of action, as evidenced by the certified copy of Form-32 filed by SEBI itself before the Trial Court. Form-32 is a public document recognized as evidence regarding directorship. The respondent's subsequent letter dated 27.04.1998 mentioning the petitioners as directors cannot override Form-32. Consequently, the High Court allowed the petition and quashed the Criminal Complaint pending against the petitioners.
The petitioners had resigned as directors on 23.02.1998, prior to the alleged cause of action, as evidenced by the certified copy of Form-32 filed by SEBI itself before the Trial Court. Form-32 is a public document recognized as evidence regarding directorship. The respondent's subsequent letter dated 27.04.1998 mentioning the petitioners as directors cannot override Form-32. Consequently, the High Court allowed the petition and quashed the Criminal Complaint pending against the petitioners.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.