Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Page of 4787
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 95724 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 16, 2024Case LawsAT
Section 32A of the IBC provides immunity to the Corporate Debtor and its assets after approval of the Resolution Plan, overriding powers under PMLA. The legislature intended to grant a clean slate to the new management. The Adjudicating Authority erred in not extending Section 32A(2) benefit to the Resolution Applicant, lifting the attachment by the Enforcement Directorate over the Corporate Debtor's assets. The NCLAT relied on Supreme Court and High Court judgments upholding Section 32A's legislative scheme and the NCLT's jurisdiction to adjudicate on release of attachments. The appeal was allowed, granting relief to the Resolution Applicant.
Section 32A of the IBC provides immunity to the Corporate Debtor and its assets after approval of the Resolution Plan, overriding powers under PMLA. The legislature intended to grant a clean slate to the new management. The Adjudicating Authority erred in not extending Section 32A(2) benefit to the Resolution Applicant, lifting the attachment by the Enforcement Directorate over the Corporate Debtor's assets. The NCLAT relied on Supreme Court and High Court judgments upholding Section 32A's legislative scheme and the NCLT's jurisdiction to adjudicate on release of attachments. The appeal was allowed, granting relief to the Resolution Applicant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4787
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
