Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 16, 2024Case LawsAT
Section 32A of the IBC provides immunity to the Corporate Debtor and its assets after approval of the Resolution Plan, overriding powers under PMLA. The legislature intended to grant a clean slate to the new management. The Adjudicating Authority erred in not extending Section 32A(2) benefit to the Resolution Applicant, lifting the attachment by the Enforcement Directorate over the Corporate Debtor's assets. The NCLAT relied on Supreme Court and High Court judgments upholding Section 32A's legislative scheme and the NCLT's jurisdiction to adjudicate on release of attachments. The appeal was allowed, granting relief to the Resolution Applicant.
Section 32A of the IBC provides immunity to the Corporate Debtor and its assets after approval of the Resolution Plan, overriding powers under PMLA. The legislature intended to grant a clean slate to the new management. The Adjudicating Authority erred in not extending Section 32A(2) benefit to the Resolution Applicant, lifting the attachment by the Enforcement Directorate over the Corporate Debtor's assets. The NCLAT relied on Supreme Court and High Court judgments upholding Section 32A's legislative scheme and the NCLT's jurisdiction to adjudicate on release of attachments. The appeal was allowed, granting relief to the Resolution Applicant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.