Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
The case involves a challenge to Assessment Orders for multiple Assessment Years u/s 74 of the respective GST enactments, 2017. The petitioner failed to provide proper information to the department, leading to shortcomings in the assessment process. The Court noted that certain charges collected by the petitioner may be taxable under GST laws. The Court directed the petitioner to cooperate with the respondent, quashed the Assessment Orders, and remitted the case for fresh assessment. The petitioner must respond to Show Cause Notices and provide necessary documents. The High Court disposed of the Writ Petitions.
The case involves a challenge to Assessment Orders for multiple Assessment Years u/s 74 of the respective GST enactments, 2017. The petitioner failed to provide proper information to the department, leading to shortcomings in the assessment process. The Court noted that certain charges collected by the petitioner may be taxable under GST laws. The Court directed the petitioner to cooperate with the respondent, quashed the Assessment Orders, and remitted the case for fresh assessment. The petitioner must respond to Show Cause Notices and provide necessary documents. The High Court disposed of the Writ Petitions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
