Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The case involves an offense u/s 5 of FEMA for carrying US$ 50,000 in Travelers Cheques without necessary permissions for a business trip. The appellant was not directly involved in applying for the foreign exchange, which was done by company directors. Despite lack of awareness, appellant was held liable for not verifying RBI permission. Finance Manager was found vicariously liable for being aware of the violation. Penalties were reduced for the appellants due to their minor roles. The appeal partially allowed, reducing penalties to Rs. 50,000 each, already pre-deposited.
The case involves an offense u/s 5 of FEMA for carrying US$ 50,000 in Travelers Cheques without necessary permissions for a business trip. The appellant was not directly involved in applying for the foreign exchange, which was done by company directors. Despite lack of awareness, appellant was held liable for not verifying RBI permission. Finance Manager was found vicariously liable for being aware of the violation. Penalties were reduced for the appellants due to their minor roles. The appeal partially allowed, reducing penalties to Rs. 50,000 each, already pre-deposited.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.