Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Petition maintainability hinges on alternative remedy availability. Excess tax refund due to ignorance and legal ambiguity. Supreme Court ruled that purely legal controversies without factual disputes should be decided by High Court, not dismissed for alternative remedy availability. However, where statute provides grievance redressal mechanism, writ petition should not be entertained. Appellant company did not dispute authority's jurisdiction or lack of CGST Act's redressal mechanism. High Court's discretion in refusing writ petitions due to efficacious alternate remedy was upheld, dismissing appeals.
Petition maintainability hinges on alternative remedy availability. Excess tax refund due to ignorance and legal ambiguity. Supreme Court ruled that purely legal controversies without factual disputes should be decided by High Court, not dismissed for alternative remedy availability. However, where statute provides grievance redressal mechanism, writ petition should not be entertained. Appellant company did not dispute authority's jurisdiction or lack of CGST Act's redressal mechanism. High Court's discretion in refusing writ petitions due to efficacious alternate remedy was upheld, dismissing appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.