Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Rectification of certain errors apparent on face of order denied in AAR ruling. AR contended AAR should have ruled on all queries. Held: No error apparent on record noticed, so no rectification required. As Customs Act provisions not attracted, differential IGST paid by applicant ineligible for ITC u/s of CGST Act, 2017. No apparent error or mistake on record as alleged by applicant, so application for advance ruling liable for rejection u/s 98(2) of CGST/TNGST Acts, 2017.
Rectification of certain errors apparent on face of order denied in AAR ruling. AR contended AAR should have ruled on all queries. Held: No error apparent on record noticed, so no rectification required. As Customs Act provisions not attracted, differential IGST paid by applicant ineligible for ITC u/s of CGST Act, 2017. No apparent error or mistake on record as alleged by applicant, so application for advance ruling liable for rejection u/s 98(2) of CGST/TNGST Acts, 2017.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
