Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Rectification of certain errors apparent on face of order denied in AAR ruling. AR contended AAR should have ruled on all queries. Held: No error apparent on record noticed, so no rectification required. As Customs Act provisions not attracted, differential IGST paid by applicant ineligible for ITC u/s of CGST Act, 2017. No apparent error or mistake on record as alleged by applicant, so application for advance ruling liable for rejection u/s 98(2) of CGST/TNGST Acts, 2017.
Rectification of certain errors apparent on face of order denied in AAR ruling. AR contended AAR should have ruled on all queries. Held: No error apparent on record noticed, so no rectification required. As Customs Act provisions not attracted, differential IGST paid by applicant ineligible for ITC u/s of CGST Act, 2017. No apparent error or mistake on record as alleged by applicant, so application for advance ruling liable for rejection u/s 98(2) of CGST/TNGST Acts, 2017.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
