Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The proper officer's order cancelling GST registration ab initio (from the initial date) is bereft of reasons and does not spell out grounds, violating principles of natural justice. The show cause notice (SCN) merely reproduces statutory provision u/s 29(2)(e) of CGST Act regarding cancellation on grounds of fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts, without disclosing nature of alleged fraud, misstatement, or suppressed facts. SCN fails to meet requisite standards, not enabling meaningful response. Cancellation order also lacks reasons or grounds. HC directs cancellation order to take effect from SCN date (28.06.2023), not retrospectively from 29.12.2022. Petition disposed of.
The proper officer's order cancelling GST registration ab initio (from the initial date) is bereft of reasons and does not spell out grounds, violating principles of natural justice. The show cause notice (SCN) merely reproduces statutory provision u/s 29(2)(e) of CGST Act regarding cancellation on grounds of fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts, without disclosing nature of alleged fraud, misstatement, or suppressed facts. SCN fails to meet requisite standards, not enabling meaningful response. Cancellation order also lacks reasons or grounds. HC directs cancellation order to take effect from SCN date (28.06.2023), not retrospectively from 29.12.2022. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.