Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessee entitled to exemption u/s 54F/54 as possession of new house property acquired within one year before sale of original asset; crucial date for purchase is when possession and control given to purchaser, not legal transfer; mere allegation of fabricated document cannot be sustained without evidence; reliance on precedents of Shahzada Begum, Laxmichand Nagda, and T.N. Aravinda Reddy cases.
Assessee entitled to exemption u/s 54F/54 as possession of new house property acquired within one year before sale of original asset; crucial date for purchase is when possession and control given to purchaser, not legal transfer; mere allegation of fabricated document cannot be sustained without evidence; reliance on precedents of Shahzada Begum, Laxmichand Nagda, and T.N. Aravinda Reddy cases.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.