Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Addition u/s 68 for director's loan ledger account was made by assessing officer (AO) considering transactions not matching previous year's financial statements. Assessee stated transactions pertained to prior assessment years. Tribunal held previous year's transactions cannot be considered income in current assessment year. Transactions related to FY 2012-13 and 2013-14, for which AO passed order u/s 143(3) on 29.01.2016 accepting closing balance of director's ledger account. AO cannot consider opening balance in current assessment year for making addition, relying on Sridev Enterprises judgment. Tribunal upheld CIT(Appeals) order deleting the addition, decided in favor of assessee.
Addition u/s 68 for director's loan ledger account was made by assessing officer (AO) considering transactions not matching previous year's financial statements. Assessee stated transactions pertained to prior assessment years. Tribunal held previous year's transactions cannot be considered income in current assessment year. Transactions related to FY 2012-13 and 2013-14, for which AO passed order u/s 143(3) on 29.01.2016 accepting closing balance of director's ledger account. AO cannot consider opening balance in current assessment year for making addition, relying on Sridev Enterprises judgment. Tribunal upheld CIT(Appeals) order deleting the addition, decided in favor of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.