Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Addition u/s 68 for director's loan ledger account was made by assessing officer (AO) considering transactions not matching previous year's financial statements. Assessee stated transactions pertained to prior assessment years. Tribunal held previous year's transactions cannot be considered income in current assessment year. Transactions related to FY 2012-13 and 2013-14, for which AO passed order u/s 143(3) on 29.01.2016 accepting closing balance of director's ledger account. AO cannot consider opening balance in current assessment year for making addition, relying on Sridev Enterprises judgment. Tribunal upheld CIT(Appeals) order deleting the addition, decided in favor of assessee.
Addition u/s 68 for director's loan ledger account was made by assessing officer (AO) considering transactions not matching previous year's financial statements. Assessee stated transactions pertained to prior assessment years. Tribunal held previous year's transactions cannot be considered income in current assessment year. Transactions related to FY 2012-13 and 2013-14, for which AO passed order u/s 143(3) on 29.01.2016 accepting closing balance of director's ledger account. AO cannot consider opening balance in current assessment year for making addition, relying on Sridev Enterprises judgment. Tribunal upheld CIT(Appeals) order deleting the addition, decided in favor of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.