Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 68 for director's loan ledger account was made by assessing officer (AO) considering transactions not matching previous year's financial statements. Assessee stated transactions pertained to prior assessment years. Tribunal held previous year's transactions cannot be considered income in current assessment year. Transactions related to FY 2012-13 and 2013-14, for which AO passed order u/s 143(3) on 29.01.2016 accepting closing balance of director's ledger account. AO cannot consider opening balance in current assessment year for making addition, relying on Sridev Enterprises judgment. Tribunal upheld CIT(Appeals) order deleting the addition, decided in favor of assessee.
Addition u/s 68 for director's loan ledger account was made by assessing officer (AO) considering transactions not matching previous year's financial statements. Assessee stated transactions pertained to prior assessment years. Tribunal held previous year's transactions cannot be considered income in current assessment year. Transactions related to FY 2012-13 and 2013-14, for which AO passed order u/s 143(3) on 29.01.2016 accepting closing balance of director's ledger account. AO cannot consider opening balance in current assessment year for making addition, relying on Sridev Enterprises judgment. Tribunal upheld CIT(Appeals) order deleting the addition, decided in favor of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.