Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Cenvat credit on immovable property constructed after issuance of completion certificate is not permissible, as transaction is treated as sale of goods, not service. Cenvat credit can be taken only on receipt of inputs and within one year from date of documents. Extended period of limitation rightly invoked as appellant was aware of ineligibility for credit after completion certificate. Imposition of penalty u/s 78 and levy of interest upheld. Appeal dismissed by Appellate Tribunal.
Cenvat credit on immovable property constructed after issuance of completion certificate is not permissible, as transaction is treated as sale of goods, not service. Cenvat credit can be taken only on receipt of inputs and within one year from date of documents. Extended period of limitation rightly invoked as appellant was aware of ineligibility for credit after completion certificate. Imposition of penalty u/s 78 and levy of interest upheld. Appeal dismissed by Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.