Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Service tax demand on income shown in Income Tax Return - Suppression of facts and contravention of Act/Rules with intent to evade tax - Extended period of limitation rightly invoked as appellant filed ST-3 Returns without fully disclosing taxable value - Differential value learnt from Income Tax Department - Penalty u/ss 78 and 77 upheld along with interest - No merits to interfere with impugned order - Appeal dismissed.
Service tax demand on income shown in Income Tax Return - Suppression of facts and contravention of Act/Rules with intent to evade tax - Extended period of limitation rightly invoked as appellant filed ST-3 Returns without fully disclosing taxable value - Differential value learnt from Income Tax Department - Penalty u/ss 78 and 77 upheld along with interest - No merits to interfere with impugned order - Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.