Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Interest rate on delayed refunds u/s 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944 restricted to 6% p.a. as per Notification 67/2003-CE (N.T.), overruling appellant's claim of 12%. Madras and Karnataka High Courts upheld 6% rate, rejecting higher rates claimed. Section 11BB empowers Central Government to fix rate between 5-30% through notification. Notification 67/2003 validly issued fixing 6% rate. Appellant's contention of order being beyond show cause notice unsustainable. Appeal dismissed, affirming impugned orders.
Interest rate on delayed refunds u/s 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944 restricted to 6% p.a. as per Notification 67/2003-CE (N.T.), overruling appellant's claim of 12%. Madras and Karnataka High Courts upheld 6% rate, rejecting higher rates claimed. Section 11BB empowers Central Government to fix rate between 5-30% through notification. Notification 67/2003 validly issued fixing 6% rate. Appellant's contention of order being beyond show cause notice unsustainable. Appeal dismissed, affirming impugned orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
