Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Interest rate on delayed refunds u/s 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944 restricted to 6% p.a. as per Notification 67/2003-CE (N.T.), overruling appellant's claim of 12%. Madras and Karnataka High Courts upheld 6% rate, rejecting higher rates claimed. Section 11BB empowers Central Government to fix rate between 5-30% through notification. Notification 67/2003 validly issued fixing 6% rate. Appellant's contention of order being beyond show cause notice unsustainable. Appeal dismissed, affirming impugned orders.
Interest rate on delayed refunds u/s 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944 restricted to 6% p.a. as per Notification 67/2003-CE (N.T.), overruling appellant's claim of 12%. Madras and Karnataka High Courts upheld 6% rate, rejecting higher rates claimed. Section 11BB empowers Central Government to fix rate between 5-30% through notification. Notification 67/2003 validly issued fixing 6% rate. Appellant's contention of order being beyond show cause notice unsustainable. Appeal dismissed, affirming impugned orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.