Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Appellant eligible for abatement without prior payment of duty for period when machine under closure. As per Rule 10 of Pan Masala Packaging Machine Rules, 2008, and CESTAT precedents, abatement claimable sans duty payment for closure period. Demand of duty unsustainable, impugned orders set aside, appeal allowed.
Appellant eligible for abatement without prior payment of duty for period when machine under closure. As per Rule 10 of Pan Masala Packaging Machine Rules, 2008, and CESTAT precedents, abatement claimable sans duty payment for closure period. Demand of duty unsustainable, impugned orders set aside, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.